London vs. Siem Reap: Detailed 2026 Comparison

London demonstrates a significantly higher level of economic development compared to Siem Reap. With a GDP per capita of $67,000 versus $6,700, London is substantially wealthier. London's economy is diversified with a sophisticated service sector, while Siem Reap's economy is primarily driven by tourism and agriculture, with a GDP growth rate of 4.96% compared to London's 1.76%. London's population is also considerably larger (9 million) than Siem Reap's (147,866).

The quality of life in London is significantly superior to that in Siem Reap. London scores much higher across international quality of life indices (83 vs. 67), particularly in healthcare (79 vs. 42), safety (92 vs. 68), and climate comfort (77 vs. 64). Commuting is generally more efficient in London (average 25 minutes) than in Siem Reap (average 7.5 minutes). Environmental quality, measured by lower pollution levels, is considerably better in London. While Siem Reap has cleaner air, London offers vastly superior healthcare access, educational facilities, and overall urban amenities.

The cost of living in London is substantially higher than in Siem Reap, reflecting the city's economic status and quality of life. Basic living expenses (excluding housing) are approximately 20 times higher in London ($1,070/month vs. $53/month). Housing costs, while still significantly higher ($2,900/month average vs. $250/month), show London at a disadvantage even when considering the property price-to-income ratio (18.5 vs. 40.6). Transportation costs are much lower in Siem Reap ($130/month vs. $3,200/month). Daily groceries cost about $100 in London and $35 in Siem Reap. Healthcare costs are negligible in Siem Reap compared to the system in London. Childcare and education costs are significantly lower in Siem Reap ($250/month vs. $1,500+