Makassar vs. Perth: Detailed 2026 Cost of Living & Quality Comparison

Makassar, Indonesia, with a population of approximately 1.3 million, presents a significantly lower cost of living compared to Perth, Australia, which has a population exceeding 2.1 million. The Cost of Living Index for Makassar stands at 23.33, while Perth's is 71.79, highlighting a substantial difference in affordability. Quality of Life metrics also differ markedly, with Makassar at 102.64 and Perth at 196.27, indicating that Perth offers a superior quality of life overall.

Economically, Perth demonstrates a much higher average net salary, with residents earning approximately $4,148.60 per month after taxes, compared to Makassar's $227.47. This significant disparity in income directly impacts affordability. Housing costs reflect this difference, with property prices per square meter in Perth's city center reaching $6,432.73, versus $1,000 in Makassar. Rent is also substantially lower in Makassar, with a 1-bedroom apartment averaging $100 per month, compared to $1,800 in Perth.

Perth scores considerably higher across key quality-of-life indicators. The Safety Index is 85.00 for Perth versus 45.00 for Makassar, suggesting safer living conditions. Healthcare access is also superior in Perth, with a score of 80.00 compared to Makassar's 60.00. Environmental factors show mixed results, with Perth having a higher Pollution Index (65.00) but a lower Climate Comfort Index (70.00) compared to Makassar's 85.00.

Perth offers significantly stronger economic prospects, with a GDP per capita of $59,600 versus Makassar's $4,000. The population growth rate in Perth (1.13%) is also higher than in Makassar (0.76%). These factors suggest better long-term economic prospects and career advancement opportunities in Perth.

The comparison reveals distinct differences between the two cities. Makassar offers substantially lower costs but fewer economic opportunities and a lower quality of life. Perth provides a higher quality of life and better economic prospects but at a significantly higher cost. The decision between these cities depends largely on individual priorities regarding cost versus quality of life and career opportunities.