Mashhad vs. Arequipa: Detailed 2026 Cost of Living & Quality Comparison

This report provides a detailed comparison of the cost of living and quality of life between Mashhad, Iran, and Arequipa, Peru, based on available data. The analysis covers key factors such as cost of living, safety, healthcare, climate, property prices, and economic indicators to help understand the relative advantages and disadvantages of each city.

Mashhad has a significantly lower Cost of Living Index (23.1) compared to Arequipa (28.31). Basic food items, transportation, and utilities are generally more affordable in Mashhad. However, Arequipa offers a higher Average Monthly Net Salary ($656.29 vs. $250), which means a higher standard of living despite the higher cost of living. The purchasing power in Arequipa is also higher, with a Purchasing Power Index of 70.53 compared to Mashhad's 34.53.

Arequipa scores higher in most quality-of-life indices. It has a higher Quality of Life Index (126.43) compared to Mashhad (93.25). Arequipa also has a higher Safety Index (57.13 vs. 51.04), Health Care Index (68.52 vs. 51.1), and Climate Index (83.9 vs. 70.3). However, Mashhad has a lower Pollution Index (70.49 vs. 82.36), indicating cleaner air.

Arequipa is more expensive for property, with a Price per Square Meter in the city center of $2,007.85 compared to Mashhad's $200.00. The Property Price to Income Ratio is similar in both cities (11.49 for Arequipa vs. 10.49 for Mashhad). Economic indicators show similar GDP per capita ($15,000 for Mashhad vs. $15,300 for Arequipa), but Arequipa has a much lower GDP Growth Rate (0.55% vs. not available for Mashhad).

Arequipa has a slightly higher GDP per capita and lower population growth rate (0.48% vs. not available for Mashhad). Mashhad has a much larger population (3.7 million vs. 1 million) but lacks data on GDP growth. Arequipa demonstrates greater economic stability with lower inflation and more consistent economic indicators.

While Mashhad offers significantly lower costs for living expenses, Arequipa provides a higher quality of life, better economic stability, and higher purchasing power. The choice between the two cities depends on individual priorities regarding cost versus quality of life and economic security.