Siem Reap vs. Kampala: Detailed 2026 Cost of Living & Quality Comparison

This report provides a detailed comparison of the cost of living and quality of life between Siem Reap, Cambodia, and Kampala, Uganda, based on available data. The analysis covers key aspects such as average income, housing costs, food and transportation expenses, healthcare, safety, and environmental factors, offering insights into the relative affordability and living standards of these two distinct cities.

Siem Reap boasts a significantly higher average net salary compared to Kampala, with residents earning approximately $340 USD per month on average, versus Kampala's $197 USD. However, this higher income must be weighed against the city's substantially higher cost of living. Kampala, despite its lower average net salary, presents a more affordable overall cost of living, particularly concerning housing, groceries, and transportation, making it relatively more budget-friendly for individuals and families.

Kampala demonstrates a clear advantage in housing affordability. The average price per square meter for an apartment in Kampala's city center is around $1,017 USD, significantly lower than Siem Reap's $343 USD. Furthermore, the monthly rent for a 1-bedroom apartment in Kampala's city center is $518 USD, compared to Siem Reap's $340 USD. While Siem Reap's property prices and rents are higher, the city's unique status as a major tourist destination and gateway to Angkor Wat adds significant value, whereas Kampala's housing market reflects its status as Uganda's capital city.

Kampala is generally more affordable for daily consumables. Groceries for a standard monthly household budget are approximately $100 USD cheaper in Kampala than in Siem Reap. Basic public transportation, such as a one-way bus ticket, is also significantly less expensive in Kampala ($0.83 USD) compared to Siem Reap ($0.50 USD). Fast food meals and dining out are also more affordable in Kampala, reflecting its status as a developing African capital city versus a developing Asian tourist hub.

Siem Reap offers a notable advantage in healthcare accessibility and quality. It has a dedicated international hospital providing comprehensive services, which is a significant improvement over Kampala's healthcare system, which faces challenges related to funding, infrastructure, and access, particularly outside major urban centers. Regarding safety, Siem Reap generally experiences lower crime rates than Kampala, although safety concerns can vary depending on specific neighborhoods and times of day in both cities.

Siem Reap faces significant environmental challenges, primarily due to its tropical climate and rapid development, impacting air quality and contributing to seasonal flooding. Kampala, while also dealing with tropical weather, faces more pronounced issues related to urbanization, including traffic congestion, air pollution from vehicles, and challenges with solid waste management leading to sanitation concerns.

Siem Reap presents a higher cost of living overall, driven by expensive housing and a higher average income, but offers better healthcare access and generally lower crime rates. Kampala is significantly more affordable in terms of housing, food, and transportation, but faces challenges with its healthcare system and safety. The choice between the two cities depends heavily on individual priorities regarding budget, healthcare needs, safety concerns, and career opportunities.