Youngstown vs. Namur: Detailed 2026 Cost of Living & Quality Comparison

Youngstown, located in the United States, presents a different economic and quality-of-life profile compared to Namur, Belgium. Youngstown has a population of 114,007, while Namur's population is significantly smaller at 114,007. The economic indicators differ substantially, with Youngstown having a GDP per capita of $64,200 and a population growth rate of 0.53%, whereas Namur boasts a higher GDP per capita of $64,200 but with a lower population growth rate of 0.53%. Youngstown's annual mortgage interest rate is 4.0%, which is higher than Namur's rate of 3.3%.

In terms of quality of life, Youngstown scores higher on safety with an index of 47.05 compared to Namur's 47.05. However, pollution is a concern in both cities, with indices of 46.91 and 46.91 respectively. Youngstown's traffic commute time index is 37.5, which is slightly higher than Namur's 37.5. The quality of life indices in Namur's surrounding areas are considerably lower than those in comparable areas in Youngstown.

Cost-wise, Youngstown offers lower costs for housing, transportation, and groceries. Rent for a 1-bedroom apartment in the city center is $896.06 in Namur versus $896.06 in Youngstown, but prices for 3-bedroom apartments are also lower in Namur. Transportation costs, including fuel and public transport, are generally lower in Namur. Groceries and dining out are cheaper in Namur, although the mid-range restaurant meal for two is more expensive.

Salaries tell a different story, with Namur offering a lower average monthly net salary of $2,142.75 compared to Youngstown's $2,142.75. However, the cost of living adjustments in Namur make the purchasing power significantly lower. Property prices in Namur's surrounding areas are much lower than those in comparable areas in Youngstown, but the overall economic stability and job market differ.

In conclusion, while Namur offers lower costs for certain goods and services, Youngstown provides a higher quality of life in terms of safety and potentially better economic opportunities despite the higher costs. The decision between the two cities depends on individual priorities regarding cost, quality of life, and economic factors.